Back to main magazine page now!!

Encounter with Charles Darwin
Why Darwin Supported Gospel Missions
Three times I crossed footprints with Charles Darwin―
in Shrewsbury, England; in Ushuaia, Argentina; and finally in London.

Charles Robert Darwin was born on February 12, 1809, in Shrewsbury, Shropshire,
England. He was the fifth child and second son of Robert Waring Darwin, a physician, and
Susannah Wedgwood. Darwin’s mother, Susannah Wedgwood, was the daughter of Josiah
Wedgwood, the pottery manufacturer.

Darwin was the British naturalist who became famous for his theories of evolution. Darwin
concluded that all life on earth evolved over millions of years from a few common ancestors,
including apes, etc.

. of Arts degree, which included studies botany and natural history. This interest
First Encounter with
Charles Darwin —
Shrewsbury, England
I walked through the streets where
Darwin once played. As a young
person, he attended the school at
Shrewsbury but admitted that he did
not do well as a student there. In 1825,
Darwin went to Edinburgh Univer-
sity in Scotland to study medicine but
dropped out after a few months. His
disappointed father scolded him with
the following words: “You care for
nothing but shooting, dogs, and rat-
catching and you will be a disgrace to
yourself and all your family.”
is father, exasperated with his
son’s failure to follow through
with his education, decided that perhaps
he should study for the Anglican priest-
hood. He enrolled him at Christ’s Col-
lege, Cambridge, to study for a Bachelor
of Anglican theology. His father had
the hope that he might become a coun-
try parson with the Church of England.

The young man again did not follow
through with the plans set before him.

He did, however, in 1831 graduate with
a bachelor’s degree. (From Wikipedia,
the free encyclopedia)
Charles Darwin had no more
education than a bachelor’s
degree from Christ’s College,
Cambridge, and was
nothing more than an
amateur naturalist.

Darwin’s bachelor’s
degree was in reality a
divinity degree. He is
not credited with any
other formal earned de-
gree in the sciences. Dar-
win’s real interest was in
would eventually lead him to explore
alternatives to a creation designed by
God. He never, however, declared him-
self as an atheist.

arwin emerged in the shadow of
some of the greatest scientific
minds in history. Francis Bacon (1561
to 1626) was described as the “Father
of the Scientific Method.” He was a
devout Christian, involved in the trans-
lation of the King James Bible, and in
1603, King James knighted him. Steve
Green in his work The
Bible in America stated,
“It would be difficult to
find any person who inte-
grated the Bible and sci-
ence so well. Faith and
fact were seamlessly wo-
ven into Bacon’s life from
the very beginning until
he died.” 1
D 1
Steve Green, The Bible in America
(Oklahoma City: Dust Jacket Press, 2013), 52.

Green also in his work referenced
Sir Isaac Newton (1642–1727). “Sir
Isaac Newton was a distinguished Eng-
lish mathematician, physicist, astrono-
mer, chemist, and theologian. Newton
is considered by many to be the great-
est and most influential scientist who
ever lived.”
Newton wrote the following:
“Gravity explains the motions of the
planets, but it cannot explain who set
the planets in motion. God governs all
things and knows all that is or can be
done.” 2
Great scientists before Darwin had
no problem with believing God while
researching the universe. In their minds,
they were simply studying the designed
world and its Designer. Albert Einstein
made the comment, “I want to know
God’s thoughts, the rest are details.”
Charles Darwin had no more edu-
cation than a bachelor’s degree from
Christ’s College, Cambridge, and was
nothing more than an amateur natural-
ist. He followed some of the greatest,
most educated, and brilliant scientists
of all time with his “ape theory.” Such
a ridiculous concept was quickly em-
braced by a world hungry for any alter-
native to God.

Darwin’s theory has never been
any more than that—a theory or
fake science; yet, the news media of
Darwin’s day, casting aside such minds
as Bacon, Newton, and others, spoke
of evolution as if all doubts had been
resolved. They instantly embraced
his ideas of natural selection as an
alternative to God.

Darwin’s theory was so presented
and publicized as science that even
some theologians, fearing their belief
in God and the Bible would appear
archaic, tried to forge evolution with
the Bible as “theistic evolution.” His
theory proposed that the whole human
scene was in a constant state of change
from one species to another.

Green cites the words of atheist
Fred Hoyle, British mathematician and
cosmologist: The chance that
higher life forms
might have emerged
in this way is
comparable to
the chance that a
tornado sweeping
through a junkyard
might assemble
a Boeing 747 from
the materials
therein. 3
Could the blood of 50 million
slaughtered unborn babies in the
United States find its origin in
Darwin’s hypothesis?
In one sense, there is a truth about
Darwin’s evolution. His erroneous
ideas have evolved into humanism and
atheism and have become the basis of
all denial of God. Even abortion has its
roots in Darwin’s theory, for if a man
is nothing more than an animal, it is
not so great a crime to kill him. Could
the blood of 50 million slaughtered
unborn babies in the United States find
its origin in Darwin’s hypothesis?
Ibid., 52.

Ibid., 64.

2 3